Chris Jackson Lawyer Direct Dealing With Objections Question Preview (ID: 33767)


This Is To Prepare You For Some Possible Objections They Might Make During Your Direct Examination Of Chris Jackson. TEACHERS: click here for quick copy question ID numbers.

If they object to questions about Chris's awards and honors being relevant
a) Your honor it is relevant because lays character foundations
b) Your honor it is relevant because we let they asked the same types of questions
c) Your honor it is relevant because Chris is the main person in the case so it is relevant
d) withdraw the question and move on

If they object and the judge says sustained what should you do
a) Ask a different question
b) Ask the question again
c) Pick your nose and fling it at the other team
d) Argue with the judge

If the other side objects and the judge says overruled what should you do
a) ask the question again
b) ask a different question
c) pick your nose and fling it at the other team
d) argue with the judge

If the other side objects to questions about Chris becoming President saying relevance you should say
a) Your honor it is relevant because it lays foundation for the protest and gives character evidence
b) Your honor it is relevant because Chris organized the protest and the protest happened before the video
c) Your honor It is relevant because it is in the affidavit
d) Your honor it is relevant because Chris is the main person in the case

If they object saying hearsay or speculation to Chris knowing about Cory's platform when running for President
a) Your honor it is not __because Chris would have known her opponents platform
b) Your honor it is not __ because Cory is a main character in the case
c) Your honor it is not __ because Chris learned it from the affidavits
d) Your honor it is not __ because Chris talked about it in her own affidavit

If they object saying speculation to the statement that some people run for president just to put in on college applications
a) Your honor it is not speculation because is not talking about Cory specifically but about past people she knew
b) Your honor it is not speculation because Chris wrote about it in her affidavit so she knew all about it
c) Your honor it is not speculation because that is why Chris ran for president and you don't speculate about your own reasons
d) Your honor their momma is a speculation

If they object to Powers being angry about the protest being relevance or speculation
a) It is relevance because it shows a motive and prior anger towards my client and it is not speculation because Chris saw it
b) Tell them to shut up and leave you alone
c) It is relevant because it happened in a meeting between half of the people in this case.
d) It is relevant because it is in the affidavit and we wrote the questions

If they object using Narrative to the description of the video
a) ask our lawyer coach about this before January
b) ???
c) ???
d) ???

If they object saying unfair extrapolation to anything
a) Your honor it is extrapolation but not unfair extrapolation, it does not change anything it's something the person wouldsay
b) Agree with them, apologize and move on
c) Your honor it is unfair extrapolation but it is allowed because of rule 403B
d) Just stare at the judge until they feel sorry for you

If they object to Mr. McLaughlin and Miss Kibler being too awesome
a) agree
b) ignore them, they are just jealous
c) ask them if Coach put them up to saying that
d) thank them

Play Games with the Questions above at ReviewGameZone.com
To play games using the questions from above, visit ReviewGameZone.com and enter game ID number: 33767 in the upper right hand corner or click here.

TEACHERS / EDUCATORS
Log In | Sign Up / Register

Help / Support / FAQ




Gaming Links