Government Civil Liberties Court Cases: Question Preview (ID: 29699)


Below is a preview of the questions contained within the game titled GOVERNMENT CIVIL LIBERTIES COURT CASES: Cases Only .To play games using this data set, follow the directions below. Good luck and have fun. Enjoy! [print these questions]


Play games to reveal the correct answers. Click here to play a game and get the answers.

Declared that the STATES COULD LIMIT free speech because the BIll of Rights only applied to Congress. It caused a problem and made incorporation necessary.
a) BARRON v. Baltimore
b) GITLOW v. New York
c) HAZELWOOD v. Kuhlmeier
d) RENO v. ACLU

Protects freedom of expression in MOVIES
a) BURSTYN v. Wilson
b) DEJONGE v. Oregon
c) NEAR v. Minnesota
d) RENO v. ACLU

protects the right to assemble by including PARADES
a) FEINER v. New York
b) MILLER v. California
c) NEAR v. Minnesota
d) DEJONGE v. Oregon

prohibits mandated PRAYER in public schools
a) LEMON v. Kurtzman
b) ENGEL v. Vitale
c) TINKER v. Des Moines
d) TEXAS v. Johnson

allows POLICE to disperse demonstrations if they threaten the peace
a) SCHENK v. U.S.
b) BARRON v. Baltimore
c) FEINER v. New York
d) BURSTYN v. Wilson

declared states could not limit free speech. Also the first case to use INCORPORATION
a) BARRON v. Baltimore
b) FEINER v. New York
c) MILLER v. California
d) GITLOW v. New York

declared that SCHOOLS could use PRIOR RESTRAINT on school publications
a) HAZELWOOD v. Kuhlmeier
b) ENGEL v. Vitale
c) LEMON v. Kurtzman
d) TINKER v. Des Moines

allowed federal AID to parochial schools for secular purposes
a) ENGEL v. Vitale
b) HAZELWOOD v. Kuhlmeier
c) TINKER v. Des Moines
d) LEMON v. Kurtzman

allowed local communities to define OBSCENITY
a) DEJONGE v. Oregon
b) TINKER v. Des Moines
c) MILLER v. California
d) FEINER v. New York

prohibited PRIOR RESTRAINT by STATES with newspapers
a) HAZELWOOD v. Kuhlmeier
b) RENO v. ACLU
c) NEAR v. Minnesota
d) BURSTYN v. Wilson

protects freedom of expression on the INTERNET
a) RENO v. ACLU
b) BARRON v. Baltimore
c) GITLOW v. New York
d) SCHENK v. U.S.

limited seditious speech in times of danger. Also established the CLEAR and PRESENT DANGER test
a) SCHENK v. U.S.
b) FEINER v. New York
c) TEXAS v. Johnson
d) BARRON v. Baltimore

protected FLAG BURNING as symbolic speech
a) FEINER v. New York
b) TINKER v. Des Moines
c) TEXAS v. Johnson
d) BARRON v. Baltimore

protected ARM BANDS as symbolic speech for students
a) HAZELWOOD v. Kuhlmeier
b) LEMON v. Kurtzman
c) TINKER v. Des Moines
d) ENGEL v. Vitale

Which amendment extended due process, extended citizenship, and protected citizens from all levels of government?
a) 13th
b) 14th
c) 15th
d) 16th

Play Games with the Questions above at ReviewGameZone.com
To play games using the questions from the data set above, visit ReviewGameZone.com and enter game ID number: 29699 in the upper right hand corner at ReviewGameZone.com or simply click on the link above this text.

TEACHERS / EDUCATORS
Log In
| Sign Up / Register