Review Game Zone
Games
Test
Preview
Back
Match it!
Match it! Select the correct answer from the pull down...Good luck!
A good example of the constitutional principle of checks and balances is:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
In its decision in Watkins v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
Freedom from prosecution for witnesses whose testimony ties them to illegal acts:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
Lying under oath:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
This member of President Reagan's National Security Council was granted immunity:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
Witnesses who do not tell the truth can be prosecuted for:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
Willful obstruction or refusing to testify before Congress or a court:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
These congressional committees may conduct investigations:
Legislative oversight
Witnesses could not be compelled to give evidence against themselves
Oliver North
Perjury
Standing and select
Immunity
Contempt
Perjury
Check it!