Review Game Zone
Games
Test
Preview
Back
Match it!
Match it! Select the correct answer from the pull down...Good luck!
10. The police enter an individual’s home without invitation or a warrant and seize evidence to be used against the individual. Which Supreme Court decision may be used to rule this evidence inadmissible in court?
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
7. The significance of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison is that the decision
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
13. The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Tinker v. Des Moines and New York Times Co. v. United States were based on interpretations of the
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
19. The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v. United States (1919) stated that
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
18. In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court ruled that
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
4. An immediate result of the Supreme Court decision in Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935) and United States v. Butler (1936) was that
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
5. Under Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Supreme Court was considered activist because of its
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
3. The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Escobedo v. Illinois all advanced the
c) Mapp v. Ohio
b) freedom of speech is not absolute
a) some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
d) rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment
d) established the power of judicial review
b) racial segregation was constitutional
d) rights of accused persons
c) expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
Check it!